Cases 1 - 10 of 61
WILLIAMS v. WHITTINGTON
as 5:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
MAURICE CORNEILUS WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CALLAWAY v. WILLIAMS
as 3:2022cv00113
Petitioner:
MAURICE CALLAWAY and PRINCESS CALLAWAY
Respondent:
WARDEN DOUGLAS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH et al v. LEAL-SALAS et al
as 4:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
MAURICE SMITH and RONNIE TOWNSEND
Defendant:
MARIO ALBERTO LEAL-SALAS, JUAN DELAERUEZ, TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
OWENS v. PHILLIPS
as 5:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN MAURICE OWENS
Defendant:
SAMANTHA NICOLE PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JIMMERSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
MAURICE K JIMMERSON, JR
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MADISON et al v. CITY OF ASHBURN
as 1:2020cv00262
Plaintiff:
Decina Peterson, Donald Maurice Madison Sr. and DONALD MAURICE MADISON, SR
Defendant:
CITY OF ASHBURN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAKE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 7:2020cv00168
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
MAURICE DION LAKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JACKSON v. USA
as 3:2020cv00047
Petitioner:
DONTAVIOUS MAURICE JACKSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SIMMONS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2020cv00042
Plaintiff:
MAURICE ANTOINE SIMMONS
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
EPKINS v. KRUEGER et al
as 7:2020cv00039
Defendant:
HEATHER L KELLY, WILLIAM NEEL, ASHLEY PAULK and others
Plaintiff:
REGINALD MAURICE EPKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
