Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Thompson v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00442
Petitioner: Maurice Lajuan Thompson
Respondent: State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Parker
as 4:2023cv00079
Petitioner: Maurice L Thompson
Respondent: David Parker and Vic Regalado, Tulsa County Sheriff in his Official Capacity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lindsey v. Crow We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00233
Petitioner: Brian M. Lindsey, Brian M Lindsey, Brian Maurice Lindsey and others
Respondent: Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson et al v. Bowens et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00608
Plaintiff: Herman Dennis and Kimberly Jackson
Defendant: Maurice Bowens and Mike Bowens
Hill v. Scharg
as 4:2014cv00451
Plaintiff: Kelly Maurice Hill
Defendant: Steven Scharg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. USA
as 4:2014cv00439
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Kelly Maurice Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Becknell v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2013cv00473
Plaintiff: Tony Maurice Becknell, Jr
Defendant: City of Tulsa , Jeff Henderson , Ronald Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cleveland v. Martin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00375
Plaintiff: Christopher Cleveland
Defendant: Terry Martin, Maurice Warrior, Glenn Waldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. USA
as 4:2012cv00147
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Kenneth Maurice Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Becknell v. USA
as 4:2011cv00777
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Tony Maurice Becknell, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?