Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Thompson v. Nueces County Jail
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Sidney Maurice Thompson, IV
Defendant:
Nueces County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacy v. Villalobos et al
as 4:2024cv00896
Plaintiff:
Antonio Maurice Lacy
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Dana Sullivan, Nurse Practitioner Crystal Mable, UTMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v Baldwin et al
as 2:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Sidney Maurice Thompson, IV
Defendant:
Laurie Sue Baldwin and Lipan Street A1 Bail Bond Driver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Jackson v. Harris County Detention
as 4:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
David Maurice Jackson
Defendant:
Harris County Detention
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Waller et al
as 4:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
David Maurice Jackson
Defendant:
Detention Officer Waller and Annonette Fielder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Waller
as 4:2022cv04357
Plaintiff:
David Maurice Jackson
Defendant:
Detention Officer Waller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Martin v. Live Oak County Jail
as 2:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
Daniel Neal Martin
Defendant:
Live Oak County Jail, Daniel Coban Barton, Jailer Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Harris County Jailer et al
as 4:2022cv03316
Plaintiff:
David Maurice Jackson
Defendant:
Harris County Jailer and Sgt T. Akidin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
