Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Mays v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mays
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Roberson et al
as 1:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Crystyn Jeanette Smith-Thomas and Heather May Thomas
Defendant:
Alma C. Roberson, Geoffrey Cummings, Albuquerque Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
May v. New Mexico Attorney General
as 1:2024cv00137
Petitioner:
Andrew Nicholas May
Respondent:
New Mexico Attorney General and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Deakin v. Magellan Health, Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv00773
Defendant:
Magellan HSRC, Inc., Magellan Health, Inc., Magellan Healthcare, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Maureen Deakin, Dale Kessler, Rachel Clerge and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
May v. EOG Resources Inc.
as 1:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Brannon White and Jereme May
Defendant:
EOG Resources Inc.
May v. Stephenson et al
as 2:2022cv00563
Petitioner:
Andrew Nicholas May
Respondent:
George Stephenson and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
May v. State of New Mexico
as 2:2022cv00302
Petitioner:
Brandon M. May
Respondent:
State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mays v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2021cv01133
Plaintiff:
Michele Denise Mays
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mays v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2020cv00193
Plaintiff:
Michele Denise Mays
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
