Cases 1 - 10 of 223
DURBIN v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2022cv03222
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAUL DURBIN
Defendant:
NANCY PATRICIA PELOSI, CHARLES ELLIS SCHUMER, ADDISON MITCHELL MCCONNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
LASSITER v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2022cv02567
Plaintiff:
DUSKIN CORBAN LASSITER
Defendant:
TODD YOUNG, JOHN BARRASSO, MARSH BLACKBURN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
In Re: SUPERIOR COURT SUBPOENAS
as 1:2021mc00100
In Re:
SUPERIOR COURT SUBPOENAS
Petitioner:
THOMAS KIRK MCCONNELL and UNITED STATES SENATE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES
Plaintiff:
AO ALFA-BANK
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
ADAMS v. MCCONNELL
as 1:2020cv03072
Defendant:
MITCH A. MCCONNELL, JR.
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WOOTEN v. UNITED STATES SENATE et al
as 1:2020cv03037
Respondent:
MITCH MCCONNELL and UNITED STATES SENATE
Petitioner:
ROBERT WOOTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CAPITOL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2020cv02710
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
CAPITOL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH
Amicus Curiae:
KEVIN CRAMER, RAND PAUL, CINDY HYDE-SMITH and others
Interested Party:
USA UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAMBETH v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv02160
Defendant:
MITCH MCCONNELL, MARK MEADOWS, MIKE PENCE and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES LAMBERTH and JAMES LAMBETH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MISCHLER v. PENCE et al
as 1:2020cv01863
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR, SHANE BAUMGARDNER, KELLY CRAFT and others
Plaintiff:
AMY MISCHLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEMOS v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv01028
Defendant:
MITCH MCCONNELL, MIKE PENCE and DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. DEMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. DOLE et al
as 1:2020cv00477
Defendant:
MITCH A. MCCONNELL, JR., BOB J. DOLE and LAMAR A. ALEXANDER
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS and DALE BRENT ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
