Cases 21 - 30 of 554
Pearson v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2019cv00031
Defendant:
James E. Dzurenda, Quentin Byrnes, James Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Garen M Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2019cv00051
Defendant:
State of Nevada, E.K. McDaniels, Dewight Neven and others
Plaintiff:
David Levoyd Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniels v. Holmes et al
as 2:2018cv02414
Defendant:
Eric Holmes, Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Plaintiff:
Keenan McDaniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kamedula v. Carr et al
as 3:2018cv00544
Defendant:
Nate Wake, Barbara Cegavske, Adam Laxalt and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Kamedula
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2018cv00517
Defendant:
Dr. Naughton, E.K. McDaniels, James G. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Bryan Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2018cv00426
Defendant:
Eldon K McDaniel, Rusti Donnelly, V. Austin and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph M Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. Fischer et al
as 2:2018cv01629
Plaintiff:
Franklin R McDaniel
Defendant:
David R Fischer, Clark County and Clark County Eight Judicial District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. Clark County et al
as 2:2018cv01543
Plaintiff:
Franklin McDaniel
Defendant:
Napcare Medical, Clark County and Napcare Dental
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRAVERS A. GREENE V. STATE OF NEVADA, ET AL.
as 3:2002cv00280
Defendant:
Jackie Crawford, E.K. McDaniel and Nevada, State Of
Plaintiff:
Travers A. Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmichael v. Gittere et al
as 2:2018cv00421
Defendant:
Renee Baker, James G. Cox, William Gittere and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Carmichael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
