Cases 11 - 20 of 85
McDaniel et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05959
Plaintiff:
Bonnie J. McDaniel and Jim McDaniel
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDaniel et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv03141
Plaintiff:
Norma McDaniel and Charles McDaniel
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDaniel v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02614
Plaintiff:
Betty McDaniel
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDaniel v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv02210
Plaintiff:
Sandra McDaniel and Verle McDaniel
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDaniel v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01022
Plaintiff:
Mechael McDaniel
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDaniel et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00524
Plaintiff:
Sue Adams McDaniel and Grady F. McDaniel
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDaniel et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv16121
Plaintiff:
Ginger McDaniel and Larry William McDaniel
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDaniel et al v. Mentor Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv14532
Defendant:
Mentor Corporation and Mentor Worldwide
Plaintiff:
Gidget Price McDaniel and William Andrew McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDaniel et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13301
Plaintiff:
Joyce McDaniel and George W. McDaniel
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDaniel et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12339
Plaintiff:
Carolyn J. McDaniel and Thomas L. McDaniel
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
