Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Smith et al v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv03742
Plaintiff:
Tynan Smith and Mary Ellen Smith
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., Owens-Illinois Glass Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Netzer v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv01589
Plaintiff:
Henry G. Netzer
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation , John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. , Owens-Illinois Glass Co. and others
Cross_claimant:
J.H. France Refractories Co. , CBS Corporation , International Paper Company and others
Cross_defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company , Bayer Cropscience, Inc. , CBS Corporation and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Donzie Bailey and Richard Ament
Consol_defendant:
A C & R Insulation Company, Inc., C. J. Coakley Co., Inc., Cooper Industries and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
MCIC, Inc., E.L. Stebbing & Co. Inc. and Hampshire Industries, Inc.
Thirdparty_defendant:
General Refractories Co., Manville Trust Personal Injury Settlement Trust, Uniroyal, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sroka et al v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv03281
Plaintiff:
John E. Sroka and Constance B. Sroka
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. , Owens-Illinois Glass Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Citrano v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02158
Plaintiff:
Dennis C. Citrano
Defendant:
John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. , E.L. Stebbing & Co., Inc. , Hampshire Industries, Inc. and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Annette C. Snyder , Mark A. Plasecki , Dennis C. Citrano, II and others
Consol_defendant:
Crown, Cork & Seal Co., Inc. , Georgia-Pacific, LLC and Hopeman Brothers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Tawney v. AC&R Insulation Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01194
Defendant:
Arvinmeritor, Inc., CBS Corporation, Eaton Electrical Corporation and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Domco Products Texas Inc., Goodrich Corporation, Navistar Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin Tawney
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Frank Houser
Counter Defendant:
Autozone Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Houser et al v. Ammco Tools et al
as 1:2013cv01179
Defendant:
Ammco Tools, CNH America, LLC, Welco Manufacturing Company and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
David Neal
Plaintiff:
Frank Houser and Ruth Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv03815
Plaintiff:
James Herbert Smith and Mary Rose Smith
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, CBS Corporation, General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
May et al v. A.C.&R. Insulation Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02836
Plaintiff:
Philip Royce May and Ruth Belchie May
Defendant:
A.C.&R. Insulation Co., Inc. , Armstrong International, Inc. , Aurora Pump, Co and others
Cross_defendant:
A.C.&R. Insulation Co., Inc. , Armstrong International, Inc. , Aurora Pump, Co and others
Cross_claimant:
Armstrong International, Inc. , The Walter E. Campbell Company, Inc. , Crane Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Joyner v. A.C. & R Insulation Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02294
Plaintiff:
James E. Joyner
Defendant:
Allen-Bradley Company, Inc., Allis-Chalmers Energy, Inc., CBS Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
John Crane, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
John Crane, Inc. , A.C. & R Insulation Co., Inc., A.O. Smith Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mosko v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01781
Plaintiff:
Clara G. Mosko
Defendant:
John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. , E.L. Stebbing & Co., Inc. , Hampshire Industries, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
AC&R Insulation Co., Inc. , J.H. France Refractories Co. , Coty, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
3M Company, A.W. Chesterton Company , Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
