Cases 81 - 90 of 108
McCurdy et al v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv02681
Plaintiff:
Michael J. McCurdy and Anna McCurdy
Defendant:
John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., Owens-Illinois Glass Co., E.L. Stebbing & Co., Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
RPM, Inc., Crane Co., JH France Refractories Co. and others
Cross Defendant:
Columbia Heating Products Co., Crane Co., Georgia-Pacific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Shifflett et al v. A.C. & R. Insulation Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv02397
Plaintiff:
Lewis Shifflett and Maybrey Shifflett
Defendant:
A.C. & R. Insulation Co., Inc., A.O. Smith Corporation, Avco Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
A.O. Smith Corporation, RPM, Inc., Crane Company, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Superior Boiler Works, Inc., T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition, LLC, Thos. Somerville Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
MILLAR et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv65975
Plaintiff:
SHERRI LEA MILLAR, BRANDON MILLAR and DAWN MILLAR
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, BONDEX INTERNATIONAL, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cross Claimant:
CRANE CO., REPUBLIC POWDERED METALS, INC., BONDEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cross Defendant:
CERTAINTEED CORPORATION, DAIMLER CHRYSLER CORPORATION, DURABLA MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Warfield et al v. Northrop Gruman Ship Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01870
Plaintiff:
James Samuel Warfield, James Samuel Warfield, Alda Smith-Warfield and others
Defendant:
Northrop Gruman Ship Systems, Inc., Owens-Illinois Glass Co., General Refactories, Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
HUDSON et al v. RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv65976
Plaintiff:
LINDA HUDSON and SHARON HUDSON
Defendant:
RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION, RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION, THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LIMING et al v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63997
Plaintiff:
JOYCE LIMING, ALVESTER BROWN, CONWAY H. BURNETTE and others
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
E.L. STEBBING, E.L. STEBBING, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INC., W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., UNIVERSAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Millar et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2007cv01063
Plaintiff:
Sherri Lea Millar, Brandon Millar and Dawn Millar
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Bondex International, Inc., Certainteed Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
Crane Co., Republic Powdered Metals, Inc., Bondex International, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Certainteed Corporation, Daimler Chrysler Corporation, Durabla Manufacturing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
WINTER v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv61746
Plaintiff:
EDITH WINTER and EDITH WINTER
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION, KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION, KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BURKHARDT v. BURKHARDT et al
as 2:2007cv62818
Plaintiff:
DANIEL H BURKHARDT
Defendant:
ELIZABETH J. BURKHARDT, ELIZABETH J. BURKHARDT, ACANDS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JACKSON v. JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILE, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62848
Plaintiff:
LEROY JACKSON, LEROY JACKSON, LEROY JACKSON and others
Defendant:
JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILE, INC., OWENS-ILLIINOIS GLASS CO., E.L. STEBBINGS & CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
