Other Contract Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
MENDY v. MORRISON et al
as 2:2022cv05862
Plaintiff: EDWARD BISSAU MENDY
Defendant: JAMES MCKENZIE MORRISON, ARES ENTERTAINMENT, TRILLER, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
TABAKIN v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
as 2:2022cv00587
Plaintiff: BRAD S. TABAKIN doing business as BRAD S. TABAKIN, ESQ., PC and BRAD S. TABAKIN ESQUIRE doing business as BRAD S. TABAKIN, ESQ., PC
Defendant: VERIZON WIRELESS doing business as VERIZON BUSINESS GROUP, TIFFANY GREAVES-MCKENZIE and CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
SEVIER v. COX COMMUNICATIONS INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv07400
Plaintiff: CHRIS SEVIER
Defendant: CYNDI MCKENZIE SHERWOOD, TIME WARNER CABLE INC., COX COMMUNICATIONS INC. and others
Petitioner: CYNTHIA A. SHERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCKENZIE et al v. BRIAN UNLIMITED DISTRIBUTION COMPANY
as 3:2011cv03157
Plaintiff: EDWARD MCKENZIE and MATTHEW GRAHAM
Defendant: BRIAN UNLIMITED DISTRIBUTION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YA GLOBAL INVESTMENTS, L.P. v. MCKENZIE BAY INTERNATIONAL LTD. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv02107
Plaintiff: YA GLOBAL INVESTMENTS, L.P.
Defendant: MCKENZIE BAY INTERNATIONAL LTD., MTI ENERGY MANAGEMENT/LIGHTING SPECIALIST, INC. and SIGNATURE STOCK TRANSFER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Plaintiff
THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY v. O.C. CLUSS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2007cv01303
Plaintiff: THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY and THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: O.C. CLUSS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, LLC, O.C. CLUSS LUMBER COMPANY, INC. and MCKENZIE PLACE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?