Cases 1 - 10 of 26
SYKES v. JONES et al
as 1:2026cv01696
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY SYKES, JR.
Defendant:
JONES, SERVER, BRYAN VANDERVORT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2026cv01629
Plaintiff:
HARRY JAMES HARRISON
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, THOMAS MILLIKAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOL v. MILIKEN et al
as 1:2026cv01337
Plaintiff:
STANLEY D. COOL
Defendant:
MILIKEN, JOHNSON, DIANNA JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JENT v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2026cv01109
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. JENT
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, KIDD, K. PARDUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERRY v. MANLEY et al
as 1:2026cv00276
Plaintiff:
RODNEY S. PERRY, SR.
Defendant:
JAMES MANLEY, JENNIFER SMITH, B. CYBORSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNER v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2026cv00279
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID CONNER
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., MELISSA RUTLEDGE, DAVID CYBORSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BREWTON v. MILLIKAN et al
as 1:2025cv02381
Plaintiff:
RYAN BREWTON
Defendant:
THOMAS MILLIKAN, RUNYAN, E. ELLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRIES v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2025cv02021
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LAUREN DWAYNE FRIES
Defendant:
B. DAVIS, HEFLIN, PERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GHOLSTON v. RUTLEDGE et al
as 1:2025cv01162
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. GHOLSTON
Defendant:
MELISSA RUTLEDGE, PREA STAFF, OMBUDSMAN DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARGUELLO v. CENTURION et al
as 1:2025cv00954
Plaintiff:
DERICK ARGUELLO
Defendant:
CENTURION, MELISSA RUTLEDGE, THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
