Cases 1 - 10 of 13
USA v. Blake
as 23-30691
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Melvin Clay Blake, Jr.
Melvin Blake v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 14-56594
Petitioner - Appellant:
MELVIN JAMES BLAKE
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD and KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General
Melvin Blake v. Tim Ochoa
as 13-56539
Petitioner - Appellant:
MELVIN JAMES BLAKE
Respondent - Appellee:
TIM J. OCHOA
Blake v. Beard et al
as 3:2013cv01496
Petitioner:
Melvin James Blake
Respondent:
Kamala D. Harris and Jeffrey Beard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melvin James Blake v. J Tim Ochoa
as 3:2012cv02251
Petitioner:
Melvin James Blake
Respondent:
J Tim Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Melvin James Blake v. J Tim Ochoa
as 2:2012cv06729
Petitioner:
Melvin James Blake
Respondent:
J Tim Ochoa
Melvin Blake v. Terri McDonald, et al
as 12-56291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN JAMES BLAKE
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRI MCDONALD, individual capacity & official capacity, MARTIN HOSHINO, official capacity & individual capacity, GILBERT ROBLES, individual capacity & official capacity and others
Melvin James Blake v. Terri McDonald et al
as 2:2012cv04006
Plaintiff:
Melvin James Blake
Defendant:
Cheree Clarizio, Cheree Clarizio, Teresa George and others
Byrl Lane, et al v. Lifelock, Inc., et al
as 10-17318
:
In re: LIFELOCK, INC., MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BYRL LANE, ROBERT E. DILLON, VILMA MARTINEZ-AZOY and others
Objector - Appellant:
JAMES E. PENTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
LIFELOCK, INC., a Delaware corporation and RICHARD TODD DAVIS
Byrl Lane, et al v. Billy Daniels, et al
as 10-17177
:
In re: LIFELOCK, INC., MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BYRL LANE, ROBERT E. DILLON, VILMA MARTINEZ-AZOY and others
Objector - Appellant:
BILLY DANIELS
Defendant - Appellee:
LIFELOCK, INC., a Delaware corporation and RICHARD TODD DAVIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
