Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Russell v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv05601
Plaintiff:
Mickey Russell
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Cook County Jail, Cook County Shiff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv50249
Plaintiff:
Craig Williams and Kathyleen Asadiah Monrose
Defendant:
T Williams, Wilts, Marona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv01232
Plaintiff:
Craig Williams and Kathyleen Asadiah Monrose
Defendant:
T Williams, . Wilts, . Marona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Jefferys et al
as 3:2022cv03072
Plaintiff:
Deon Hampton
Defendant:
Rob Jefferys, Camile Lyndsay, Logan Correctional Center Mental Health Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Cook County Jail Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv01956
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Johnson
Defendant:
Cook County Jail Department of Corrections, Thomas Dart, Mental Health Department MST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. IDOC et al
as 3:2021cv00073
Defendant:
Doctors, Shawnee Correctional Center, IDOC and others
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00637
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miguel Battle
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Statesville NRC Mental Health Administration, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boykin v. Dixon Correctional Center et al
as 3:2014cv50210
Plaintiff:
Marshaun Boykin
Defendant:
Dixon Correctional Center, IDOC, Wexford Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cordrey v. Harrington et al
as 3:2014cv00108
Plaintiff:
Johnny R Cordrey
Defendant:
Richard Harrington, L Phelps, C/O Starkweather and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
