Cases 1 - 10 of 90
In re: Merck Mumps Vaccine Antitrust Litigation
as 23-3089
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHATOM PRIMARY CARE PC, ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, DR. ANDREW KLEIN and JOHN IVAN SUTTER, M.D.
Defendant / Appellant:
MERCK & CO INC
In Re: Merck Mumps Vaccine Antitrust Litigation, et al
as 23-8046
Petitioner:
MERCK & CO INC
Respondent:
CHATOM PRIMARY CARE PC, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, DR. ANDREW KLEIN and JOHN IVAN SUTTER, M.D.
SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES LLC v. MERCK & CO INC
as 2:2023cv21255
Petitioner:
SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES LLC
Respondent:
MERCK & CO INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stephen Krahling, et al v. Merck & Co Inc
as 23-2553
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN A. KRAHLING and JOAN A. WLOCHOWSKI
Defendant / Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC
Merck & Co Inc v. United Steelworkers of America
as 21-1764
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL 4-575
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC
In re: Zostavax Products
as 20-1690
Defendant / Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC, MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP and MCKESSON CORP
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOAN SPEIRS, as the personal representative of the estate of August Speirs
JUDAY et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv02037
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
PAT JUDAY and CHRIS JUDAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chris Juday, et al v. Merck & Co Inc, et al
as 19-1144
Defendant / Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAT JUDAY and CHRIS JUDAY
Defendant:
ANN REDFIELD
Ford v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv20079
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IN RE ROTAVIRUS VACCINES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2018cv01851
Plaintiff:
SCHWARTZ PEDIATRICS S.C.
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
