Cases 21 - 30 of 207
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
AFGE Local 501 v. Merrick Garland, as Attorney General of the United States, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv20474
Plaintiff:
AFGE Local 501
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice and Merrick Garland, as Attorney General of the United States, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60198
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
McGill, Rodney v. Garland
as 1:2024cv20468
Plaintiff:
Rodney Maurice McGill, Sr.
Defendant:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Mastrangelo v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2024cv20204
Plaintiff:
John Mastrangelo
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND and Steven Dettelbach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Mastrangelo v. GARLAND et al
as 0:2024cv60105
Plaintiff:
John Mastrangelo
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND and Steven Dettelbach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
