Cases 1 - 4 of 4
SUBPOENAS TO ADAM KINCAID AND THE NATIONAL REPUBLICAN REDISTRICTING TRUST et al
as 1:2022mc00067
In Re:
SUBPOENAS TO ADAM KINCAID AND THE NATIONAL REPUBLICAN REDISTRICTING TRUST
Petitioner:
ADAM KINCAID and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN REDISTRICTING TRUST
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC.
City of El Cenizo, Texas, et al v. State of Texas
as 5:2017cv00404
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Ken Paxton and State Of Texas
Movant:
City Of Austin
Plaintiff:
City of El Cenizo, Texas, Mario A. Hernandez, League Of United Latin American Citizens and others
Consol Plaintiff:
City of San Antonio, El Paso County, La Union Del Pueblo Entero, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Judge Sarah Eckhardt, Sheriff Sally Hernandez and Travis County
Consol Defendant:
Steve McCraw and Texas Department of Public Safety
Amicu:
Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
USA, et al v. Bd of Ed Cty of Chgo
as 1:1980cv05124
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Board of Education of the City of Chicago
Movant:
Joseph J Cicero
Amicu:
American Civil Liberties Union and Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chamber of Commerce v. Janet Napolitano
as 09-2006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Individually a District of Columbia Corporation, ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INCORPORATED, Individually a Maryland Corporation, SOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, Individually an Ohio Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary of Homeland Security, ALBERT A. MATERA, Chairman of the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae - None:
MEXICAN-AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND, NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION-IMMIGRANTS RIGHTS PROJECT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
