Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Moore et al v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2020cv01922
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Employment Training and Rehabilitation, State of Nevada, DETR and others
Plaintiff:
London Troy Moore, Michael Alford Moore and Michael Troy Moore
Moore v. United Food and Commercial Workers 8 Golden State et al
as 2:2020cv01911
Defendant:
Patricia L Loveall, United Food and Commercial Workers 8 Golden State, Jack L Loveall and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Troy Moore
Moore v. Goodman et al
as 2:2019cv00661
Defendant:
Brian Scott, Joe P Gloria, Carolyn G. Goodman and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Troy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. City of Las Vegas et al
as 2:2019cv00537
Defendant:
Carolyn G. Goodman, City of Las Vegas, Barbara Cegavske and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Troy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Dept et al
as 2:2017cv02022
Defendant:
Fremont Street Experience LLC, Las Vegas City Hall Marshals, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Dept and others
Plaintiff:
Michael T Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore vs Collection Service of Nevada, Inc
as 3:2016cv00049
Defendant:
Collection Service of Nevada, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Moore
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Moore
as 2:2015cv01865
Counter Claimant:
Michael J. Moore
Defendant:
Michael J. Moore
Counter Defendant:
Securities and Exchange Commission
213) 443-1904 (fax:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Moore et al
as 2:2009cv01637
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Michael J Moore and Moore & Associates Chartered
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
