Cases 1 - 10 of 14
LACKNER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2022cv04951
Plaintiff:
JON J. LACKNER
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NICOLL v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2022cv02336
Petitioner:
DAVID G NICOLL
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Mr. MICHAEL CARVAJAL and ALIX M MCLEAREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MARTINEZ-BROOKS v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2021cv11307
Plaintiff:
DIANTHE MARTINEZ-BROOKS
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
PERRI v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2021cv04858
Defendant:
DAVID E. ORTIZ and MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Plaintiff:
BRIAN A. PERRI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOODCHILD et al v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2021cv00790
Petitioner:
PETER GOODCHILD, ELIEZER SOTO-CONCEPCION, JOAN ABREU-FELIZ and others
Respondent:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, DR. NICOLLETTA TURNER-FOSTER and DAVID E. ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BENTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv00032
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, DAVID ORTIZ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
ROSCOE BENTON, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENTON v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2020cv14743
Defendant:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and DAVID ORTIZ
Plaintiff:
ROSCOE BENTON, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIXON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv05994
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, WILLIAM BARR, DAVID ORTIZ and others
Plaintiff:
DONOVAN DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv05888
Plaintiff:
CLIFTON DAVIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, DAVID ORTIZ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITLOW v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv05715
Respondent:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, WILLIAM BARR, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Petitioner:
JEFFREY WHITLOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
