Cases 1 - 10 of 147
DAZA-VALENZUELA v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2009cv01363
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS DAZA-VALENZUELA
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, THOMAS R. DECKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mends v. Chertoff et al
as 4:2009cv00333
Petitioner:
Nick Mends
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Mukasey, Raymond Simonse and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Flahn v. Mukasey et al
as 4:2009cv00128
Petitioner:
Zangar A. Flahn
Respondent:
Michael P Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Felicia Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Baker v. Chertoff
as 1:2009cv00036
Plaintiff:
Timothy Peter Baker
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lin v. Mukasey et al
as 4:2009cv00076
Petitioner:
Shan Zhou Lin
Respondent:
Michael P Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Felicia Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Champagne v. Mukasey et al
as 4:2009cv00064
Petitioner:
Fritz Champagne
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, David Venturella and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Alphonse v. Mukasey et al
as 4:2009cv00042
Petitioner:
Lenet Alphonse
Respondent:
Michael P Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Felicia S Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bhatty v. Hassell et al
as 4:2008cv02390
Petitioner:
Shariq Abbas Bhatty
Respondent:
Scott Hassell, Michael B Mukasey, Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Camara v. Mukasey et al
as 4:2008cv02308
Petitioner:
Moussa Camara
Respondent:
Michael P. Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Raymond A. Simonse and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bhatty v. Hassell et al
as 4:2008cv02215
Plaintiff:
Shariq A. Bhatty
Defendant:
Scott Hassell, Michael B Mukasey, Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
