Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Warner v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Warner, Jr
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Tracy Reveal, Chae Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spurlock v. Ruckel et al
as 1:2023cv00721
Plaintiff:
Joseph Spurlock
Defendant:
Chaplin Ruckel, Michael Davis and Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv02601
Plaintiff:
Jamal M. Bey
Defendant:
Chaplain Blaire Smith and Michael Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Engle et al
as 3:2021cv01346
Plaintiff:
Joseph Miller
Defendant:
Paul Engle, Ed Sheldon and Michael Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goff v. Chambers-Smith, et al
as 1:2021cv00315
Defendant:
Steven Reynolds, Annette Chambers-Smith, Michael Davis and others
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Goff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2020cv02807
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425
Bruggeman et al v. Davis et al
as 2:2020cv04639
Defendant:
Warden Emma Collins, Emanuel Samuthram, Michael Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lytle, Michael Fogt and Christopher Bruggeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. PepsiCo, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01961
Defendant:
PepsiCo., Inc., Bottling Group, LLC and PepsiCo, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Goldwire v. Smith-Chambers et al
as 2:2020cv02673
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Goldwire
Defendant:
Mrs. Cleveland, Marva Allen, Alexander Kostenko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heid et al v. Marbley et al
as 2:2020cv01512
Defendant:
Circuit Judge Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judge Karen Nelson Moore, District Judge Algenon L. Marbley and others
Plaintiff:
James E. Damron and Ray Scott Heid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
