Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Itson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv02092
Plaintiff:
Kardell A. Itson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Steve Mulroy, Michael Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Crowell
as 2:2019cv02448
Respondent:
Georgia Crowell
Petitioner:
Michael Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2016cv03299
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Terry Carter, Ms. (f/n/u) Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Kinnaman et al
as 3:2015cv00898
Plaintiff:
Larry Tyrone Watkins
Defendant:
Terry Kinnaman, Michael Davis, CCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loyde v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
Mack Mandrell Loyde
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Blair Leibach, (f/n/u) Corlew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2014cv01899
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, (f/n/u) Porter, (f/n/u) Dethrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Corrections Corporation America et al
as 3:2014cv01259
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Smith
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation America, Michael Davis, Michael Corlew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Withers v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2014cv01191
Plaintiff:
James A. Withers, II
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, f/n/u Hiligoss, (f/n/u) Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bumpas v. Corrections Corporations of America et al
as 3:2010cv01055
Plaintiff:
Darrell W. Bumpas
Defendant:
Corrections Corporations of America, Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Daron Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
