Cases 1 - 10 of 13
HUNTER v.ZOELLER
as 3:2016cv00018
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HOWARD HUNTER
Respondent:
UNKNOWN NAMED DIRECTOR OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and GREG ZOELLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HUNTER v. GREG ZOELLER, INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 3:2016cv00010
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HOWARD HUNTER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNKNOWN NAMED DIRECTOR OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and GREG ZOELLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
REED v. LARIVA
as 2:2015cv00212
Respondent:
LEANN LARIVA
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HOWARD REED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
REED v. MCKINNEY
as 1:2015cv00322
Defendant:
LARRY J. MCKINNEY
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOWARD REED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REED v. LARIVA et al
as 2:2015cv00005
Respondent:
J. F. CARAWAY, CHARLES DANIELS, EDGE and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HOWARD REED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HUNTER v. BUTTS
as 3:2014cv00029
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HOWARD HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DALE et al v. BUCK et al
as 3:2013cv00011
Defendant:
DOCTOR BORDINE, DOCTOR BROWN and WARDEN BUCK
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY M DALE and MICHAEL HOWARD HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. WARDEN
as 3:2013cv00002
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOWARD HUNTER
Defendant:
JOHN DOE WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter et al v. Parker
as 3:2010cv00520
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HOWARD HUNTER and RICHARD C. NORRIS
Respondent:
GEORGE PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HUNTER et al v. PARKER
as 1:2010cv01589
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HOWARD HUNTER and RICHARD C. NORRIS
Respondent:
GEORGE PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
