Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jones, Brent M. v. Yarusso et al
as 1:2024cv21958
Plaintiff:
Brent Michael Jones and Brent Micheal Jones
Defendant:
A. Yarusso, H. Fitoria, B. Campos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Yarusso et al
as 1:2023cv23474
Plaintiff:
Brent Michael Jones
Defendant:
A. Yarusso, H. Fitoria, L. Paige and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Pelzer et al
as 2:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Donderrious Williams
Defendant:
Jeremy Pelzer, Michael Jones, Steven Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00692
Defendant:
Michael Jones, Jr. and The City of Andalusia
Plaintiff:
Michael Tyson Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Jones et al
as 1:2016cv00377
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Townsend
Defendant:
Michael Jones and Jeb Fannin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron Jones v. Mrs. M. Reherman, et al
as 13-10274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON MICHAEL JONES, a.k.a. Michael John Aaron Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
M. REHERMAN, Unit C Unit Manager, FCC Coleman Medium, FCC COLEMAN - MEDIUM WARDEN, FIGUROA, Mrs. FNU, FCC Coleman Medium Case Manager Coordinator and others
Jones-Bolding v. Garett et al
as 5:2012cv03442
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones-Bolding
Defendant:
Jerry Garett and Town Creek Police Department
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Reherman et al
as 5:2011cv00699
Plaintiff:
Aaron Michael Jones
Defendant:
M. Reherman, Jorge Pastrana, FNU Figuroa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. FCC Coleman et al
as 5:2011cv00520
Plaintiff:
Aaron Michael Jones
Defendant:
FCC Coleman and Federal Prison Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. F.C.C. Coleman et al
as 3:2011cv00873
Plaintiff:
Aaron Michael Jones
Defendant:
FCC Coleman and Federal Prison Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
