Cases 1 - 10 of 35
EL v. WOLF et al
as 2:2021cv02520
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, JIYA RABEVETSKY, GOEHRING, RUTTER, AND BOEHM and others
Plaintiff:
DELILAH PASSE EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREENE v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv05444
Plaintiff:
JOHN GREENE
Defendant:
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN THOMAS, MARVIN GRAAF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRYCZEWSKI et al v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
PRZEMYSLAW GRYCZEWSKI
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, MICHELLE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAIN v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2015cv05524
Plaintiff:
MARCELLUS CAIN
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THE NORTH WEST AMEXEM, FEZ PROVINCE et al v. WOLF et al
as 2:2015cv03606
Plaintiff:
DELILAH PASSE EL, R.LYNN HATSHEPSUT MA'ATKARE EL, NANYA AMIR EL and others
Defendant:
TOM WOLF , KATHLEEN KANE , MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PARKER v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2015cv02213
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, M. FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. MEANS et al
as 2:2015cv02207
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
RAYFORD A. MEANS, MCKINLEY, RAMOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv04454
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv04450
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv04453
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, CHARLES RAMSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
