Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 51 - 60 of 766
ORTIZ v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2015cv04689
Plaintiff: XAVIER B. ORTIZ
Defendant: MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, ABELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COSTON v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2015cv04692
Plaintiff: COREY COSTON
Defendant: MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and M. FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE INC. et al
as 2:2015cv04690
Plaintiff: FREDRICK BROWN
Defendant: ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE INC., CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2015cv04703
Plaintiff: HAROLD ADAMS
Defendant: MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and M. FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKINNEY v. NUTTER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv04671
Plaintiff: DALE MCKINNEY
Defendant: MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, M. FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAGAN v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICE, CORIZON et al
as 2:2015cv04475
Plaintiff: CONFERSO PAGAN
Defendant: PRISON HEALTH SERVICE, CORIZON, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GEE v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2015cv04319
Plaintiff: RUSSELL GEE
Defendant: MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, M. FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2015cv04295
Plaintiff: TROY COOPER
Defendant: MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and M. FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. CORIZON INC. PRISON HEALTH SERVICE et al
as 2:2015cv04141
Plaintiff: COSME RIVERA
Defendant: CORIZON INC. PRISON HEALTH SERVICE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLASSEN v. NUTTER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv04078
Plaintiff: JOSE CLASSEN
Defendant: MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, M. FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?