Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Martin v. Fox, et al.
as 23-3684
Plaintiff / Appellant:
O. Z. MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT FOX, Warden, JOSEPH BICK, Medical Doctor, OGNJEN PETRAS, Physician Surgeon and others
(PC) Temple v. Gibson et al
as 2:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Troy Alexander Temple
Defendant:
Michael Gibson, Imo Ebong, Martin Cadeiras and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Ronnie Govea v. Robert Fox, et al
as 23-15034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE R. GOVEA
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT W. FOX, Warden, F. RADING, JOSEPH BICK and others
(PC)Birrell v. DiTomas
as 2:2022cv01834
Plaintiff:
David Wesley Birrell and Bella-Christina Birrell
Defendant:
Michelle DiTomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Birrell v. DiTomas et al
as 2:2022cv01528
Plaintiff:
David Wesley Birrell and Bella-Christina Birrell
Defendant:
Michele Ditomas, Valerie T Liu and Denelda Footman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel Windham, Jr. v. C. Wofford, et al
as 22-15387
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL WINDHAM, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
C. WOFFORD, Associate Warden, C. SHELLING, Associate Warden, J. MEDINA, Associate Warden and others
(PC) Martin v. Fox et al
as 2:2019cv02075
Defendant:
Joseph Bick, J. Lewis, Michele Ditomas and others
Plaintiff:
O.Z. Martin and O. Z. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Windham v. Wofford et al
as 2:2018cv02656
Plaintiff:
Samuel Windham, Jr.
Defendant:
C. Shelling, Joseph Bick, J. Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. Ditomas et al
as 1:2018cv00702
Plaintiff:
Michelle Burke
Defendant:
Michele Ditomas, Robert Fox, Scott Kiernan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. Ditomas, et al.
as 2:2018cv01578
Plaintiff:
Michelle Burke
Defendant:
Michele Ditomas, Robert Fox, Scott Kiernan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
