Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Toomer v. Robinson et al
as 3:2021cv00102
Plaintiff:
Jesse Carl Toomer
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Michelle Jackson, Pamela Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. King et al
as 3:2020cv00482
Defendant:
Mr. Fillepip, Mrs. Michelle Jackson, Officer McKinnel and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Banks
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Brazier et al
as 3:2019cv00467
Defendant:
Mrs. Unknown Johnson, Dr. William Brazier and Michelle Jackson
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jerome Edwards
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ladner et al
as 3:2019cv00208
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Vivian Frazer, Deputy Warden James Fillyaw, Warden Brian Ladner and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gross v. M.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2017cv00494
Plaintiff:
Larod Gross
Defendant:
M.D.O.C., Pelicia Hall, Ron King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. King et al
as 3:2017cv00385
Plaintiff:
Depriest Gray
Defendant:
Ronald King, Michelle Jackson and Patricia Garner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brassfield v. Boyd et al
as 3:2017cv00072
Plaintiff:
Undraneckio Brassfield
Defendant:
Josephine Boyd and Michelle Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Shaw et al
as 3:2017cv00057
Plaintiff:
Tyrone James Walker
Defendant:
Frank Shaw, Norris Hogans, Ray Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. M.D.O.C. Records Department et al
as 3:2016cv00803
Plaintiff:
Patrick Detoya Coleman
Defendant:
M.D.O.C. Records Department, Michelle Jackson, Pamela Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Jackson
as 3:2016cv00750
Plaintiff:
Patrick D. Coleman
Defendant:
Michelle Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
