Cases 1 - 6 of 6
US v. Cadden
as 21-2003
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
BARRY J. CADDEN
Interested Party:
MATTHEW CADDEN, EMILIA CADDEN, E. R. CADDEN and others
US v. Cadden
as 21-1602
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
BARRY J. CADDEN
Interested Party:
MATTHEW CADDEN, EMILIA CADDEN, E. R. CADDEN and others
US v. Chin
as 21-1574
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
GLENN A. CHIN
Interested Party:
MATTHEW CADDEN, EMILIA CADDEN, E. R. CADDEN and others
v. Affiliated Diagnostic of Oakland, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv11006
Defendant:
Revival Physical Therapy LLC, Scan True, LLC, Sinai University Medical Group PC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
West Bend Mutual Insurance Company v. Affiliated Diagnostic of Oakland, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv11007
Defendant:
Sinai University Medical Group PC, Revival Physical Therapy LLC, Michigan Institute of Musculoskeletal Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
West Bend Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Artis, et al v. N.E. Compounding Pharmacy, Inc, et al
as 14-1714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING PHARMACY, INC, d/b/a New England Compounding Center, AMERIDOSE, LLC, MEDICAL SALES MANAGEMENT, INC and others
Trustee:
PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center
Interested Party:
PAIN MEDICINE SPECIALISTS PA, UNIVERSAL PAIN MANAGEMENT MEDICAL CORPORATION, d/b/a/ Universal Pain Management, PAIN ASSOCIATES OF CHARLSETON, LLC, d/b/a InverveneMD and others
Defendant:
HOWELL ALLEN CLINIC, DEBRA SCHAMBERG, INSIGHT IMAGING, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN GUZMAN
Interested Party - Intervenor:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS, in the Chapter 11 Case of New England Compunding Pharmacy, Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
