Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Jackson v. Midland Mortgage Company et al
as 2:2020cv02549
Defendant:
Midland Mortgage Company and Minnesota Life Insurance
Plaintiff:
Joe Willie Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miken Construction Company, Inc. v. Safeguard Properties, LLC., et al.
as 1:2019cv01308
Defendant:
Dovenmuhle Mortgage, Inc., Nationstar Mortgage, LLC dba Mr. Cooper, CitiMortgage, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Miken Construction Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-4079
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Simmons v. Shapiro & Massey, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00776
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Simmons
Defendant:
Shapiro & Massey, LLC, Midland Mortgage Co. and Midfirst Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In re: Christopher Simmon
as 15-8028
Debtor:
In re: CHRISTOPHER BERNARD SIMMONS
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
MIDFIRST BANK and MIDLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10
Intervenor - Intervenor:
CAIRO BASEM IMHOTEP BEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00643
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv11400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00466
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
MidFirst Bank, et al v. Johnston et al
as 5:2014mc00014
Movant:
MidFirst Bank and Midland Mortgage Co.
Respondent:
Todd A. Johnston and Tracy M. Johnston
Devlin Detchon, et al v. MidFirst Bank, et al
as 13-4163
Appellant:
DEVLIN SCOTT DETCHON and JULIE ANN DETCHON
Appellee:
MIDFIRST BANK, WELLS FARGO BANK and MIDLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
