Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Theodore O'Brien v. Mike Knowles et al
as 2:2004cv03897
Respondent:
Mike Knowles and Bill Lockyer, -
Petitioner:
Theodore O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jason Jones et al v. State of California et al
as 1:2011cv02104
Plaintiff:
Jason Earl Jones and Jones Capital Trust
Defendant:
State of California, California Correctional Peace Officers Association, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chung Kao v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2011cv01899
Defendant:
M Acuna, R Ballesteros, C Bliss and others
Plaintiff:
Chung Kao
Lorenzo Mora v. Mike Knowles
as 2:2008cv06166
Respondent:
Mike Knowles
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Mora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrews v. Knowles et al
as 3:2010cv02109
Petitioner:
Marcus Andrews
Respondent:
Mike Knowles and Bill Lockyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stevens v. Knowles et al
as 2:2010cv00914
Plaintiff:
Lyralisa Lavena Stevens
Defendant:
Mike Knowles, J. Clark Kelso, T. Kimura Yip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elmore v. Knowles et al
as 2:2010cv00529
Petitioner:
Tonie Elmore
Respondent:
Kelly Harrington and Mike Knowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Knowles
as 2:2003cv02211
Petitioner:
Mylvin Otis Lewis
Respondent:
Mike Knowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Higbee v. Knowles, et al
as 2:2004cv01820
Petitioner:
Anthony Higbee
Respondent:
Mike Knowles , Board of Prison Terms and Attorney General for the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bunyard v. Knowles
as 4:2003cv01280
Petitioner:
John P. Bunyard
Respondent:
Mike Knowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
