Cases 41 - 50 of 103
Individual #1 et al v. Pompeo
as 4:2020cv02366
Plaintiff:
Individual #1 and Third-Party (The Synagogue)
Defendant:
Mike Pompeo
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Rodriguez Duran v. Pompeo et al
as 8:2020cv00995
Defendant:
Mike Pompeo and Christopher Landau
Plaintiff:
Cayetano Rodriguez Duran
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Vasquez v. Barr et al
as 7:2020cv00114
Plaintiff:
Manuel Lopez Vasquez
Defendant:
William Pelham Barr, Mike Pompeo and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Al Hamdawee v. Pompeo et al
as 1:2020cv02521
Plaintiff:
Abduljabbar Abed Abbas Al Hamdawee
Defendant:
Chirstopher Wray and Mike Pompeo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
INAYAT et al v. POMPEO et al
as 1:2020cv00971
Defendant:
MIKE POMPEO, JOHN DOE, PAUL W. JONES and others
Plaintiff:
ISMAT ULLAH, INAYAT ULLAH KHAN and FARYAL INAYAT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
BEBERMAN v. POMPEO
as 1:2020cv00873
Plaintiff:
JULIE BEBERMAN
Defendant:
MIKE POMPEO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Maehr v. U.S. Department of State
as 20-1124
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, in his official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY T. MAEHR
Vinson El et al v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2020cv01492
Defendant:
Mike Pompeo, Andrew Cuomo and William Barr
Plaintiff:
Akeem Umar Kawadow Bey, Ras Jai Bey and Deidre Vinson El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WAQAR et al v. POMPEO et al
as 1:2020cv00708
Defendant:
MIKE POMPEO, PAUL WILLIAMS JONES, CARL C. RISCH and others
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD WAQAR and RISHAM TARIQ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Tao Enterprises, LLC. et al v. Pompeo et al
as 3:2020cv00454
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Mike Pompeo, Robert W. Forden and others
Plaintiff:
Tao Enterprises, LLC., Xiaowei Du and Tao Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
