Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,739
(PC) Harrison v. Birtwell et al
as 2:2024cv01413
Plaintiff: Michael David Harrison
Defendant: Birtwell, Moore, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02944
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheikhuna v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00739
Plaintiff: Awes Sheikhuna
Defendant: Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watterson v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00732
Petitioner: Elijah Watterson
Respondent: Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Abdullah v. Casaurang et al
as 2:2024cv01223
Plaintiff: Jalaal Abdullah
Defendant: A. Casaurang, Warden, Associate Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahmoud v. Holz et al
as 2:2024cv00806
Plaintiff: Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant: Holz, Bartlette, Brendal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Nelson Ammons et al v. Ian Parkinson et al
as 2:2024cv03229
Plaintiff: Charles Nelson Ammons, Bryant Miller and Alexander Volonakis
Defendant: Ian Parkinson and County of San Luis Obispo, CA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stratton v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00667
Petitioner: Jaime Michelle Stratton and Jared Michael Clark
Respondent: Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00645
Petitioner: Robert Vincent Clark
Respondent: Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Samperi v. Nagi et al
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff: Mark Anthony Samperi
Defendant: Kendra Nagi, Connor Burch, Strodtbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?