Cases 1 - 10 of 3,938
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Eglaus, Assony v. Captain Lyons et al
as 2:2024cv14109
Plaintiff:
Assony Eglaus
Defendant:
Captain Lyons, Sergeant Phillips, Deputy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Flowers et al
as 6:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Idecheac A. McCoy
Defendant:
Mark Flowers, Deputy Nelson, Deputy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
MARIO M THOMAS
Defendant:
JAMES WILLIAM MILLER, SHAWN SWAIN and DAWN A HART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DEVON MILLER
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
MICHEAL DEVON MILLER
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prime Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. RAD Medical Transportation Group Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv21208
Plaintiff:
Prime Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
RAD Medical Transportation Group Corp., Yoanka Cabrera and Scott Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Miller v. Monster Reservations Group, LLC
as 6:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Matthew Miller
Defendant:
Monster Reservations Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
