Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Silva v. Rylander et al
as 4:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Christopher Z Silva
Defendant:
Kate Rylander, Stacey Cooper, Linda Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Miller v. Schelp
as 4:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Miller
Defendant:
Matthew T. Schelp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Miller v. Blind Ambition STL, LLC
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Crickett Miller
Defendant:
Blind Ambition STL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Baldwin v. Devine et al
as 2:2023cv04206
Plaintiff:
Laura Marie Baldwin
Defendant:
Joshua Calvin Devine doing business as Circuit Judge, Callaway County 13th Circuit Court, Kevin M J Crane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Busch Jr.
as 4:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Miller
Defendant:
Billy Busch Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Miller v. Peters
as 4:2023cv01054
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Miller
Defendant:
Tracey Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cruz-McCoy et al v. San Diego Child Welfare Services et al
as 2:2022cv04193
Plaintiff:
Leila Cruz-McCoy and Leila Marie Cruz-McCoy
Defendant:
San Diego Child Welfare Services, Lynette Miller, Christopher Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
