Cases 1 - 10 of 2,845
Robert Miller Photographer, LLC v. Earl G. Graves, Ltd.
as 1:2024cv03916
Plaintiff:
Robert Miller Photographer, LLC
Defendant:
Earl G. Graves, Ltd. doing business as Black Enterprise
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Carre v. Murphy
as 1:2024cv03576
Plaintiff:
Francois Didier Laurent Carre
Defendant:
Felicity Lesley Miller Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Miller v. Remolacha LLC
as 1:2024cv03495
Plaintiff:
William Miller
Defendant:
Remolacha LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Mosby v. Miller
as 6:2024cv06291
Petitioner:
Marcus Mosby
Respondent:
Supt. Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jennings v. Durham et al
as 9:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Khalil Jennings
Defendant:
Correction Sgt. M. Durham, Correction Officer Devon Delaney, Correction Officer M. Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Magdaleno v. Miller Dedicated Services, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03355
Plaintiff:
Santa Magdaleno
Defendant:
Miller Dedicated Services, LLC, Miller Auto Leasing Co., AM Castle & Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Celestine v. Miller
as 1:2024cv02060
Petitioner:
Fritz Celestine
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
