Cases 31 - 37 of 37
MORROW et al v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv67517
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. MORROW and ARLENE W. MORROW
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., A.O. SMITH WATER PROD. CO, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PALASZYNSKI et al v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv67519
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN H. PALASZYNSKI and JOHN G. PALASZYNSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHETTINI et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63279
Plaintiff:
LOUIS SCHETTINI and FRANCIS SCHETTINI
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., AC & S INC., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Stamp v. Metropolitan Life, et al
as 07-1061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN STAMP
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company of America Administrator-Benefits, EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, Exxonmobil Benefit Plan and others
Kropfelder v. Exxon Mobil Oil Corp.
as 1:2006cv05939
Plaintiff:
Bernard R. Kropfelder and Christine B. Kropfelder
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Oil Corp., Storto Enterprises and Storto Enterprises doing business as Jacksonville Exxon
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Diedeman v. Exxon Mobil Oil Corp.
as 1:2006cv05923
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff:
Ronald W. Diedeman and Joan C. Diedeman
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Oil Corp. and Storto Enterprises doing business as Jacksonville Express
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Nolin v. A-C Product Liability Trust
as OHN/1:00-CV-10680
Plaintiff:
Nolin and Robert W. Nolin
Defendant:
A-C Product Liability Trust, A.P. Green Industries, Inc., ACMC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
