Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Trustees of the Cedar Rapids Sheet Metal Workers Local 263 Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Modern Sheet Metal, Inc
as 1:2021cv00110
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Cedar Rapids Sheet Metal Workers Local 263 Health & Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local Union No. 263 Retirement Savings Plan and Trustees of the Cedar Rapids Sheet Metal Workers Local 263 Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Modern Sheet Metal, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
SHEET METAL WORKERS' LOCAL 19 et al v. MODERN SHEET METAL, INC.
as 2:2015cv03171
Plaintiff:
SHEET METAL WORKERS' LOCAL 19 , SHEET METAL WORKERS' HEALTH & WELFARE FUND OF LOCAL NO. 19 , SHEET METAL WORKERS' PENSION FUND OF LOCAL NO. 19 and others
Defendant:
MODERN SHEET METAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
SHEET METAL WORKERS' LOCAL 19 et al v. MODERN SHEET METAL, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv03043
Plaintiff:
SHEET METAL WORKERS' LOCAL 19 , SHEET METAL WORKERS' HEALTH & WELFARE FUND OF LOCAL NO. 19 , SHEET METAL WORKERS' PENSION FUND OF LOCAL NO. 19 and others
Defendant:
MODERN SHEET METAL, INC. and ADAM BURGHARD, JR.
Garnishee:
WELLS FARGO BANK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SHEET METAL WORKERS' LOCAL 19 et al v. MODERN SHEET METAL, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv04905
Plaintiff:
SHEET METAL WORKERS' LOCAL 19, SHEET METAL WORKERS' HEALTH & WELFARE FUND OF LOCAL NO. 19, SHEET METAL WORKERS' PENSION FUND OF LOCAL NO. 19 and others
Defendant:
MODERN SHEET METAL, INC. and ADAM BURGHARD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
SHEET METAL WORKER'S LOCAL 19 et al v. MODERN SHEET METAL, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv04906
Plaintiff:
SHEET METAL WORKER'S LOCAL 19, SHEET METAL WORKERS' HEALTH & WELFARE FUND OF LOCAL NO. 19, SHEET METAL WORKERS' PENSION FUND OF LOCAL NO. 19 and others
Defendant:
MODERN SHEET METAL, INC. and 1606 MANNING BOULEVARD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
