Cases 1 - 10 of 46
SCHMIDT v. TYLER et al
as 3:2014cv00468
Plaintiff:
DAN SCHMIDT
Defendant:
DAYNNA TYLER, KRISTA NAVARRO, JAMES WINTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dan Schmidt v. Secretary, FL DOC, et al
as 13-13777
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAN SCHMIDT
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MONICA DAVID, FPC Commissioner and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Dan Schmidt v. Secretary, FL DOC, et al
as 12-15428
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAN SCHMIDT
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MONICA DAVID, FPC Commissioner and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
RIVERS v. PATE
as 4:2012cv00508
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD RIVERS
Defendant:
TENA PATE, MONICA DAVID, SARAH J RUMPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHMIDT v. TUCKER
as 5:2012cv00246
Petitioner:
DAN SCHMIDT
Respondent:
KENNETH S TUCKER and MONICA DAVID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SCHMIDT v. TUCKER
as 5:2012cv00226
Petitioner:
DAN SCHMIDT
Respondent:
KENNETH S TUCKER, MONICA DAVID and PAM BONDI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VALE v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
as 4:2011cv00501
Plaintiff:
EDWARD VALE
Defendant:
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, B PEARSON, RICK ESTRELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valle v. Scott et al
as 3:2011cv00953
Plaintiff:
Manuel Valle
Defendant:
Rick Scott , Pam Bondi , Jeff Atwater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron Pugh, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 11-12577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON PUGH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FREDERICK B. DUNPHY, Commissioner/Chairman, TENA M. PATE, Vice Commissioner and others
Thomas Thorne v. Chairperson Fl Parole Comm., et al
as 10-15246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EUGENE THORNE
Defendant - Appellee:
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, TENA M. PATE, Parole Commissioner and MONICA DAVID, Parole Commissioner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
