Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Argueta v. 188 Fast Food, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02690
Defendant:
Mansour Fadel, Ehsanullah Ashrati, 188 Fast Food, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jaime Argueta
Monsour et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04755
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Monsour and Nancy Monsour
Defendant:
Zimmer US, Inc., Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. f/k/a Zimmer Holdings, Inc., Zimmer, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Monsour v. NTN Buzztime, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv08755
Defendant:
Michael Gottlieb, Richard Simtob, Allen Wolff and others
Plaintiff:
Aref Monsour
Bright Kids NYC, Inc. et al v. Kabbage, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv09221
Plaintiff:
Theodore Monsour II, Bright Kids Chicago, Inc., Mike's Auton Service, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kabbage, Inc., Robert Frohwein and Kathryn Petralia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Whistleblower Productions, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv05258
Plaintiff:
Mary Ellen Belding, Jeffrey Monsour, Walter Wenger and others
Defendant:
Michael Reichenberg, St8cked Media LLC and Sola Adenekan
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Saleh et al v. Ali et al
as 1:2016cv09830
Plaintiff:
Fatah Saleh and Monsour Al-Kabyalee
Defendant:
Hamad Ali, Silas Metro Holdings Corp. , James G. Dibbini and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Rivera et al v. Ten Star Deli, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv04837
Plaintiff:
Jorge Chamorro, Ruben De Jesus Vargas Batista and Jose Rivera
Defendant:
Gameel Saeidi, Ten Star Deli, Inc. and Monsour Zan Dani
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warner v. Monsour Winn Kurland & Warner, LLP et al
as 2:2009cv03557
Plaintiff:
Roy Warner
Defendant:
Monsour Winn Kurland & Warner, LLP and Stephen Winn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
