Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Mooney v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv03195
Plaintiff: Joseph Michael Mooney
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cron et al v. Mooney Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00525
Plaintiff: Gregg Cron and Frank Dresen
Defendant: Mooney Construction, Inc., Timothy W. Mooney and Jerry Lyons
Brackett v. Mooney Construction, Inc.
as 1:2009cv01927
Plaintiff: Michael Brackett
Defendant: Mooney Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) Labor - Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Type: Labor
Mooney v. United States
as 1:2009cv01697
Petitioner: Reginald Mooney
Respondent: United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
National Physicians Holding Company et al v. Middlebury Equity Partners LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2009cv00021
Plaintiff: National Physicians Holding Company, National Physicians Holding Company, Physicians Re Captive Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Middlebury Equity Partners LLC, Todd Michael Enright, Allen Mooney & Barnes Investment Advisors LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mooney v. Homeowners Mortgage Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00090
Plaintiff: Connie Mooney, Connie Mooney and Connie Mooney
Defendant: Homeowners Mortgage Enterprises, Inc. and Morris Hardwick Schneider, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mooney v. Sizer et al
as 1:2008cv00713
Petitioner: Joseph Michael Mooney
Respondent: Frank Sizer, United States Marshal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00084
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?