Cases 21 - 30 of 280
Christopher Starr v. E. Hill, et al
as 22-1350
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MORRIS STARR
Defendant / Appellee:
E. COE HILL, Medical Provider, MARGARET QUELLETE, Doctor, SUSAN GROFF, Medical Provider and others
Carl MorrisIn re: Carl Morris
as 22-1208
Petitioner:
In re: CARL MORRIS, aka Carl Henry Pruitt
Respondent:
MIKE BROWN, Warden
Morris Rucker v. Jim Purviance, et al
as 22-5192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MORRIS RUCKER
Defendant / Appellee:
JIM PURVIANCE, Executive Director of the Tennessee Board of Parole, RICHARD MONTGOMERY, Tennessee Chairman, ZANE DUNCAN, Tennessee Board Member, Tennessee Board of Parole and others
Glenn Glatz v. Ronald Newcomb, et al
as 21-6188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLENN FRED GLATZ
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD CROCKETT NEWCOMB, DAVID B. RAUSCH, in his official capacity, EDWARD CANTRELL MILLER and others
Morris Beals, et al v. Countrymark Energy Resources,
as 21-6152
Plaintiff:
MORRIS W. BEALS and JONI BEALS
Intervenor:
CLEARPATH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and STINSON BROS. WELDING SERVICE, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTRYMARK ENERGY RESOURCES, LLC
Morris Beals, et al v. Countrymark Energy Resources,
as 21-6145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MORRIS W. BEALS and JONI BEALS
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTRYMARK ENERGY RESOURCES, LLC
Alvin Frazier v. Amy Coffelt, et al
as 21-1740
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALVIN DWAYNE FRAZIER
Defendant / Appellee:
AMY COFFELT, Food Service Supervisor, KEVIN LINDSEY, Warden, D. SMITH, Deputy Warden and others
USA v. Morris Phillips
as 21-6068
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MORRIS ANTHONEY PHILLIPS
Dale Morris v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 21-2901
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DALE LESTER MORRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC, Director of, CARMAN MACINTIRE, Chief Medical Office and SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Warden
USA v. Carlos Morris
as 21-5797
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CARLOS MORRIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
