Cases 21 - 30 of 128
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02252
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02251
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, S.C.S.O. Jail Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02241
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02239
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County City, S.C.S.O. Jail Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pipkin v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02223
Plaintiff:
Byron Pipkin
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, State of Tennessee, Chief Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pipkin v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02095
Plaintiff:
Byron Pipkin
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Kirk Fields, Chief Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. Shelby County Sheriff Jail et al
as 2:2022cv02878
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff Jail, Chief Rudd, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. Shelby County Sheriff Jail / 201 Poplar Ave. et al
as 2:2022cv02848
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff Jail / 201 Poplar Ave., Floyd Bonner, Lt. Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Premier Facilities Services, LLC
as 1:2022cv01213
Plaintiff:
Richard Morris
Defendant:
Premier Facilities Services, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
