Cases 51 - 60 of 121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv05730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
U.S. Bank National Association v. Morris et al
as 2:2016cv00963
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Jean E Morris , Daniel W Morris , Department of Treasury-Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cyr et al v. Pierce County, Washington et al
as 2:2016cv00430
Plaintiff:
John Francis Cyr and William Dean Morris
Defendant:
Pierce County, Washington , Richard N Folden , Raymond Readwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Blake et al
as 2:2015cv01829
Plaintiff:
Amber Morris
Defendant:
Ronald C. Blake and F/V Ace
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2015cv01828
Plaintiff:
Amber Morris
Defendant:
Ronald C. Blake
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2015cv01827
Plaintiff:
Amber Morris and Ronald C. Blake
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 951
Morris et al v. Shrimp Hunter, LLC
as 2:2015cv01439
Plaintiff:
Amber Morris and Tyler Waterson
Defendant:
Shrimp Hunter, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1916
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2015cv05546
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Advance Ross Corp , BNSF Railway Company, bp product north america, inc. and atlantic richfield company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
United States of America et al v. Advance Ross Sub Co et al
as 3:2015cv05548
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of Washington , Puyallup Tribe of Indians and others
Defendant:
Advance Ross Sub Co, BNSF Railway Company, BP Products North America Inc and Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
