Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 256
HAMILTON v. LOWE et al
as 1:2017cv01977
Plaintiff: JAN B. HAMILTON
Defendant: JENNIFER LOWE, OFFICERS AND TRUSTEES OF THE SUPREME COURT HISTORICAL SOCIETY, RALPH I. LANCASTER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPEIGHT-BEY v. SAAD
as 1:2017cv01544
Petitioner: MORRIS SPEIGHT-BEY
Respondent: J. SAAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Morris Fahnbulleh v. Diversified Reporting Service, et al
as 17-7107
Plaintiff / Appellant: Morris B. Fahnbulleh
Defendant / Appellee: Diversified Reporting Services, Inc., John Doe, David E. Grey and others
Morris Fahnbulleh v. Diversified Reporting Service, et al
as 17-7107
Plaintiff - Appellant: Morris B. Fahnbulleh
Defendant - Appellee: Diversified Reporting Services, Inc., John Doe, David E. Grey and others
DONALDSON et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2017cv01206
Plaintiff: JAMES DONALDSON , PEGGY DONALDSON , ADRIAN BUTLER and others
Defendant: ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
FAHNBULLEH v. DIVERSIFIED REPORTING SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00926
Plaintiff: MORRIS B. FAHNBULLEH
Defendant: DIVERSIFIED REPORTING SERVICES, INC., JOHN DOE, DAVID E. GREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-7071
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Morris Warren v. Eric Wilson
as 17-5025
Plaintiff - Appellant: Morris J. Warren
Defendant - Appellee: Eric Wilson, Warden
USA v. Morris Fahnbulleh
as 17-3014
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant - Appellant: Morris B. Fahnbulleh
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00198
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?