Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Culumber v. Morris Network of Mississippi, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Toni Miles Culumber
Defendant:
Morris Network of Mississippi, Inc. doing business as WXXV-TV, Morris Multimedia, Morris Network, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Phillips v. Cain et al
as 4:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Russell Phillips
Defendant:
Nathan "Burl" Cain, Pelicia Hall, Jeworski Mallett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Estate of Roosevelt Holliman et al v. Turner et al
as 4:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Roosevelt Holliman and Michelle Lumzy
Defendant:
Marshal Turner, Brenda S. Cox, Pelicia Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
M.K. v. Pearl River County School District et al
as 1:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
M.K.
Defendant:
Pearl River County School District, P.B., P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00195
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
