Cases 1 - 10 of 53
MORRIS v. GEO et al
as 3:2023cv24757
Plaintiff:
AREALEUS K MORRIS
Defendant:
GEO, MEDICAL PROVIDER AT BLACKWATER, L BERRIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. DOE et al
as 3:2023cv24716
Plaintiff:
MORRIS LEE MOORE
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIES v. HOLMES COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
ANTWOIN DAVIES
Defendant:
HOLMES COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, JOHN TATE, MICHAEL RALEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. DALVERY
as 5:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
MORRIS LEE MOORE, JR
Defendant:
DALVERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS v. MIDDLEBROOKS et al
as 5:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
LARRY MORRIS and RICKY FULTON
Defendant:
SCOTT MIDDLEBROOKS, JACQUELYN BLACKMON, T W TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY
as 3:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LITTON MORRIS
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and ESCAMBIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 3:2022cv17426
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LITTON MORRIS
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS v. INCH et al
as 3:2021cv00360
Defendant:
MARK INCH, LEVINS and D LOCKE
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAVERN MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE et al
as 4:2021cv00110
Defendant:
ISAAC BOYKIN, CITY OF TALLAHASSEE and JUSTIN HILL
Plaintiff:
LARRY LEE MORRIS, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS v. COONROD et al
as 3:2021cv00187
Defendant:
INCH, COONROD, BOOKER and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAVERN MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.