Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Mann v. Loveday et al
as 6:2024cv03130
Plaintiff:
James Mann
Defendant:
Loveday, Missouri Department of Corrections, Duryea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shores v. Morris
as 4:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Andrew Shores
Defendant:
Donna Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darden v. Luechtefeld et al
as 4:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Dominique Deangelo Darden
Defendant:
Debra Luechtefeld, Kyle Clinkingbeard, Valerie Huhn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Director of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Shiloh M. Morris
Defendant:
Director of Corrections and Entire Nursing Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Apple Store et al
as 4:2023cv01509
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Graham
Defendant:
Apple Store, Lens Crafter's, Technical Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Clemons-Abdullah et al
as 4:2023cv01082
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Jennifer Clemons-Abdullah, Darnel Spear, Tammy Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyce v. City of Fulton, Missouri et al
as 2:2023cv04111
Plaintiff:
James Edward Boyce
Defendant:
City of Fulton, Missouri, Fulton Police Department, Jonathan Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Hancock
as 4:2023cv00167
Petitioner:
Stephen P. Morris
Respondent:
Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Potter v. Lett et al
as 4:2022cv00710
Plaintiff:
Jason M Potter
Defendant:
Stacey Lett, Michael Barrett, Alan D Pratzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Dicus et al
as 1:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
Joshua Allen Lee Morris
Defendant:
Kenneth Ryan Dicus and Nicholas Jain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
