Cases 21 - 30 of 96
SIMMONS v. ROXBURY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2017cv02526
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY W. SIMMONS
Defendant:
ROXBURY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, MORRIS COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, DENVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2017cv02049
Plaintiff:
BRIAN MORRIS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUSER v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2016cv09072
Plaintiff:
BRANDON HOUSER
Defendant:
B. WILLIAMS, JOHN DOES 1-6, MORRIS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY RESPONSE TEAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07849
Plaintiff:
MORRIS ANDREW RICHARDSON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2016cv07746
Plaintiff:
LAFESA MORRIS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL and CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07599
Plaintiff:
JEROME MORRIS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARTY v. HARTY et al
as 2:2016cv06779
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY M HARTY
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, MORRIS COUNTY, MORRIS COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2016cv06277
Plaintiff:
JAMES MORRIS, JR
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv05894
Plaintiff:
MORRIS CLARK
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NIBLACK v. UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE et al
as 2:2016cv01087
Plaintiff:
STANLEY L. NIBLACK
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE, JEFFREY DICKERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
