Cases filed in Idaho
Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Gisel v. Agler et al
as 1:2012cv00360
Plaintiff: Dan Morris Gisel
Defendant: David Agler, Acel K Thacker and Idaho Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Rawlinson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00551
Plaintiff: Harold E Ford
Defendant: Lois Genice Rawlinson , John Scott , Jackie Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00534
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00538
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Carlen
as 3:2010cv00032
Petitioner: Darrel W. Morris
Respondent: Trena Carlen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris et al v. Sudweeks et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00015
Plaintiff: William Morris and Lorna Morris
Defendant: Jay Sudweeks, Jane Doe Sudweeks, May, Sudweeks & Browning LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Morris We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00476
Petitioner: Darrel W Morris
Respondent: Randy Blades
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2009cv00458
Plaintiff: Nickolus Dwayne Williams
Defendant: State of Idaho, Sabino Ramirez, Mary Quinlan-Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Federal Trade Commission v. MCS Programs LLC et al
as 1:2009mc06681
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Defendant: MCS Programs LLC, United Savings Center Inc, USC Programs LLC and others
Beck et al v. Ysursa
as 1:2007cv00299
Plaintiff: Rod W. Beck, Barry Peterson, Renee Stucki and others
Defendant: Ben Ysursa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?