Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Rodarte (PS) v. Cox et al
as 1:2024cv01704
Plaintiff:
Adrian Rodarte
Defendant:
Larry Cox, Virgil Ensey, Virgina Cowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dressel (PS) v. Colorado Department of Corrections (CDOC) et al
as 1:2024cv01628
Plaintiff:
Spencer Dressel
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections (CDOC), Moses Andre Stancil, Jeff Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01416
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 lm - Fed. Question - Legal Malpractice
Steele (PS) v. Stencil et al
as 1:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Brandon T. Steele
Defendant:
Andre Moses Stencil and Jared Polis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Chad Jones
Defendant:
Moses Stancil, Jessica Krueger, Jeremiah Velasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Albert Garza
Defendant:
Moses Andre Stancil, Brekke and Rasor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson (PS) v. Stancil
as 1:2024cv01203
Petitioner:
Lonnie Ray Robertson
Respondent:
Moses Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelley (PS) v. Stancil
as 1:2024cv01234
Petitioner:
Anthony Kelley
Respondent:
Andre Moses Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gottorff (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv00695
Respondent:
Moses Andre Stancil, Moses Andres Stancil, Richard Persons and others
Petitioner:
David J Gottorff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
